LEAH DOUGLAS
  • About
  • Work
  • Awards, etc
  • Covid-19
  • Contact
  • Newsletter

why it's a privilege to demand we let ray kelly speak

10/29/2013

 
Okay, here's the thing. Here's the thing about Ray Kelly's speech at Brown.

I don't want to call out specific people here. I acknowledge that conversation around this issue has been tense, loaded, and heated. I also acknowledge that a variety of voices have allied themselves in the fight against Kelly's speech, for which I am grateful. 

But I must also acknowledge the voices who wish to drown out the voices of oppressed communities. I need to process all the folks on my Facebook feed talking about how Brown students should not have shouted down and cancelled Kelly's inevitably offensive, appalling lecture in List Auditorium today.

I cannot see one more status pleading that we ask him hard questions; that we engage in discussion with one of the most lauded racists of our time; that we be more "open-minded" in pursuit of a campus community that embodies Brown's values (whatever those are). It makes me want to BREAK THINGS. Here is why.

Certain populations in this country are told that what they say deserves to be heard. Certain demographics are lauded for having strong opinions, for pushing the envelope, for speaking loudly and standing up for what they believe in.

Do you know who these people are? Guess. GUESS. (Hint: Not women. Not POC. Not LGBTQA. Also, they look like a lot of the folks perpetuating anti-protest rhetoric on my newsfeed.)

Now, please understand that I certainly recognize that my white privilege, my Ivy League education, and my strong personality empower me to speak and be heard in many situations. I am entitled to a platform in many communities, increasingly even on this blog and especially as I try to raise awareness of my writing and work. I believe that I deserve to be listened to, and that makes me entitled. I constantly examine this position, hoping to continually use this entitlement in solidarity with folks less privileged than myself. (And if you have constructive things to say about how this essay is not pursuant to that goal, please engage with me!)

And I was also taught my whole life that what I have to say is less important than what white men have to say. I was taught this by the media, by gender expectations, by visions of leadership that did not represent me or my female peers. I was taught: glass ceiling. I was taught: stay quiet. I was taught: make me a sandwich.

From what I have gathered and learned from my incredible friends and peers organizing an enormous effort to shut down Kelly's lecture, my experience is not unique. Many of us in marginalized or oppressed communities feel that our voices are not valued. Some have, in recent years, been taught this in not-so-subtle fashion by the New York Police Department. Violence and oppression from the police is status quo in New York City today. I have felt this impact to an extent myself, having been exposed to sexism and verbal harassment from the very people allegedly keeping me safe. This state of fear is a direct result of Ray Kelly's "proactive policing," including stop-and-frisk.

It has taken me years to develop a sense of my voice, and to find comfort in speaking my mind. I find empowerment in feminist, activist, and anti-racist communities who echo and amplify messages that guide my decision-making every day. I work and aspire to one day claim those descriptors myself. 

But despite the growth and proactivity of progressive communities, we are not living in an equal society. We are not living in a world where anti-racism is "the visible opinion," as some horrible person wrote on Brown University Compliments. We live in a world where oppressed communities ARE OPPRESSED. THAT MEANS THEY ARE NOT LISTENED TO. And an auditorium at Brown University, though we so desperately wish to believe ourselves special and unique, is not absent the context of our not-at-all-colorblind society. 

I am not at all surprised that many folks opposed to Kelly's policies didn't even entertain asking him questions. Why? Because I was never taught that if I simply ask a well-thought-out question, someone in a position of power will listen to me. Because collective action, chanting, and protest is many communities' only hope of being heard in a society that is simply unwilling to acknowledge their voices. 

I don't understand the logic that if those opposed to Kelly would just ask him questions, somehow some greater truth would be told. That is simply a privileged understanding of how politics and debate operates in our country. The only truth is the truth of human experience. And human experience in New York City, under the military control of the NYPD, is in desperate need of a new "visible opinion." Human experience has showed us that stop-and-frisk is destroying communities and lives. Asking communities affected by or opposed to that policy to stay silent IS OPPRESSION.

I so wish we lived in a society where I could expect that, given a platform and time for Q&A, Ray Kelly could engage in conversation with students positioned against his racist policies. Unfortunately, as a New Yorker who is far too aware of the direct consequences of white male privilege, I strongly disagree that such a space could have ever been created today.

In sum, thanks to my Brown friends for fucking shit up. 
Ben
10/29/2013 08:56:59 am

Thank you for this

Matt
10/29/2013 09:37:21 am

It is so typical of an immature entitled brown student to write/argue in this form.

*admission defending a hole in my argument*

BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT

*restate my argument*

When Ron Paul came last spring, nobody got this stirred up about his homophobic and racist past. Why not? Because he is the 'cool' politician who markets to our generation?

People like Ray Kelly don't give a fuck. About any of us. And he's not leaving Providence a changed man. You've accomplished nothing.

Leah (author)
10/29/2013 09:58:16 am

Hi Matt!

I agree that it's regretful a similar movement was not staged against Ron Paul. Hopefully this protest will increase student momentum and amplify the importance of thinking critically about invited guests in the future.

All my best,
Leah

Amy J
10/29/2013 09:45:47 am

Thank you for this thoughtful post, Leah! Well said.

Me
10/29/2013 09:50:22 am

"I don't understand the logic that if those opposed to Kelly would just ask him questions, somehow some greater truth would be told. That is simply a privileged understanding of how politics and debate operates in our country."

People of color are the only ones being silenced, and many of us who are black and from NY wanted to engage in conversation with Kelly. Maybe you should reconsider which side is privileged. Not many people in the discussion on this protest are people of color effected by these policies.

Leah (author)
10/29/2013 09:55:04 am

Hello! I really appreciate your feedback and take it to heart. I certainly do not mean to suggest or state that POC are necessarily or entirely supportive of today's protest. I am doing my very best, as we all are, to find my place in this conversation and in doing so, to acknowledge and challenge my privilege to participate in the conversation at all. As I said in my essay, I am very receptive to constructive critique and your comment certainly falls in that category. Thank you for taking the time to read and to respond.

All my best,
Leah

Lisa
10/29/2013 01:10:09 pm

If you do not give the man time to speak or the decency to do that, everything you say to him will be disregarded and fall on deaf ears. What people said today has already been said to him time and time again. You hijacked my learning opportunity and my chance for discourse with this man. As a policy entrepreneur, wouldn't you want me to have that conversation? To take his accounts into consideration when making city and state policy? I think you would. These are the repercussions of your actions.

Sarah
10/29/2013 10:00:23 am

So let me get this straight: because minorities are given less of a voice in our society, they (and their supporters) have the right to not only silence other voices, but call those who wish to hear different points of view "horrible people"? The fact is, anti-racism *is* the visible opinion inside the Brown Bubble, and when controversial lectures are shut down the community loses a chance for valuable discourse.

By successfully preventing this lecture, the protesters have changed the conversation on campus from one about police brutality and racial profiling to one about freedom of speech and the maturity of Brown students. Not a win for them, from my point of view.

ally
10/29/2013 11:35:15 am

I completely agree with your second paragraph. Whether we did so for well-justified reasons or not, we hurt our own cause here today. And for that I'm embarrassed.

Palmi
10/29/2013 02:14:30 pm

I completely agree.

Marcel
10/29/2013 02:46:26 pm

You also have to think of the broader context. What happened to Ray Kelly was covered nationally. Brown's institutional power (Ivy League, etc.) was symbolically leveraged to publicly reject what Ray Kelly stands for. I think the significance of this far outweighs the value of discourse that could have happened, most of which can probably be found online anyway

Alum 2013
10/29/2013 02:57:00 pm

So, in essence, what you are saying is that a group of approximately 100 protesters can exploit their (Ivy League) university's good reputation to advance their private social justice campaign? Does it not bother you that a particularly vocal group of less than 5% of the student body can "represent" the college on a national level?

Sarah
10/29/2013 03:23:34 pm

I think you might be missing the point of "discourse" -- it's not to recreate that which can already be found on the internet, but to examine and reexamine all sides of an issue until the participants understand the less black-and-white aspects. We are intelligent students. We have a responsibility to not just read the well-researched opinions of others, but to think and form our own independent opinions. That is what was taken away -- not just the opportunity to hear Ray Kelley's story, but the opportunity to engage in thoughtful conversation.

Alum 2011
10/29/2013 03:51:46 pm

Perhaps it is *you* who should be thinking in a broader context. Why on earth would you want to embarrass a guest speaker? Aside from disgracing Brown, Kelly might just choose to expand his Stop and Frisk attitude because of it.

L
10/29/2013 10:10:23 am

Hi.
I like this post, and it made me think, but I don't agree with what you're saying here.
I am one of those who was unable to hear Ray Kelly speak today because of the protests. I am also one of those who is highly opposed to stop-and-frisk.
We must understand our enemies in order to change them and the world. I was unable to do that today.

Elizabeth Laytin link
10/29/2013 11:56:22 am

I'm shocked at the hubris of those who think shutting down a speaker is laudable. I am a Brown grad who lives in NYC. Do you who "hate" Kelly know that "stop and frisk" was requested by those who live in the buildings near where it was done? Do you acknowledge that perhaps, let's say the older and possibly African American residents of neighborhoods invite police to protect them from drug dealers and kids with guns? Who is prosecuted when a stop and frisk turns up guns and drugs? The innocent? I've met Kelly and he's a decent guy who listens to others. Get real, young Brown kids....investigate before you cast the first stone.

Julian
10/29/2013 12:36:07 pm

"I've met Kelly and he's a decent guy"?? and you think that the majority of Black and Brown folks in NYC are asking for stop and frisk? The relationship between police and communities of color is a war zone, and this clearly shows which side you are on.

Lisa
10/29/2013 01:13:31 pm

Did Ray Kelly start stop-and-frisk? No
Was he responsible due to his job duties to implement it? Yes
Would he have been fired if he refused to? Probably

a
10/29/2013 01:15:33 pm

^^ Lisa, EXACTLY.

Alum 2012
10/29/2013 01:40:39 pm

Hi Julian, thanks for imposing your black-and-white thinking on this issue instead of acknowledging that maybe, just maybe, the issue is deserving of a little critical thinking, you anti-intellectualist twit.

Alum 2013
10/29/2013 10:16:06 am

Here's the thing, Brown is an intellectual institution first and foremost. Its not a social justice campaign as much as you may wish. Your arguments are advocating intellectual dishonesty and anti-intellectualism (despite the fact you greatly benefitted from Brown and your other schooling, I'm sure, because they were intellectual institutions).

Lisa
10/29/2013 01:12:20 pm

Well said! There is a time and a place. The University is not the place today. These protesters and hecklers negatively impacted everyone that was there to have a productive, intellectual conversation. They own an apology to Noah Krieger's parents, who were in attendance.

Me 2
10/29/2013 10:22:23 am

"In sum, thanks to my Brown friends for fucking shit up."

This sums up your immature point of view. How is it fair that a minority of students and community members think that they have the right to shut down a dialogue? The majority of people in the room opposes Kelly's policies and was there to argue with him.
You are no different than the tea party. You only want to hear your own arguments and are unable to engage in constructive dialogue.
Sad day for the whole student body. I feel ashamed.

Sad Bruno
10/29/2013 01:49:29 pm

I totally agree. Today's events were a black mark for the Brown community and it's appalling that even for a day, our great university was closed for discussion. Denial of speech is never a worthy tactic to pursue.

M
10/29/2013 11:22:54 am

I am afraid that we are bordering on a type of politically correctness that is going to spill into total silence. I would not listen to Ray Kelly speak for any other reason than to try to understand, to have a glimpse into the mind of someone who has implemented a very obviously hurtful and detrimental policy. Once we understand people like this and their motives, we can stop others like them from gaining positions of power where they will target and hurt different groups.

I am embarrassed about today's conduct. The message Brown sends out is that we are, to quote a friend, "so open-minded that we are becoming closed." If we refuse to hear the other side we can never stop it. The world will not become a better place if we know we are right so we shout it at others. The world will become a better place when we speak to other humans as human beings, with many flaws and a lot of heart.

Facts
10/29/2013 12:35:26 pm

http://philmendelson.com/2012/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/CrimeStatsNYCvDC2010.gif

Facts
10/29/2013 12:35:49 pm

http://nypost.com/2013/09/19/gunstats/

Tanya
10/29/2013 12:39:37 pm

Keep your friends close. Keep your enemies closer.

Julian
10/29/2013 12:43:14 pm

Thanks for posting this, and this debate is just ridiculous. It's the same boring and reused arguments that get used any time people are successful in standing up to oppressors. See the thing is, nothing changes if people wait till the end and wait to ask a couple pointed questions, no one would even be talking about this, it's just status quo. At least now there's a visible show of a powerful counter-narrative that can change at least one small thing. And so of course all the reactionaries and apologists come out the word work wringing their hands and crying about "civil dialogue". Thank you for exposing your true colors, it's a lot better this way than when you hide behind some liberal mask.

Palmi
10/29/2013 02:27:14 pm

Are you seriously insinuating that people who actually want to engage in dialogue to discredit Kelly (rather than staging a disrespectful protest that goes against Brown's mission as a place of learning and discussion) are being racist?
You have got to be kidding me.

As somebody who has been subject to racism myself throughout my childhood, I would like to say that I think it is exactly your suggested approach of "no dialogue, just fight back to make a statement" that exacerbates problems.

The idea that only extremely liberal attitudes are acceptable/worthy of hearing/discussing is pervasive in Brown, and imo, it speaks more to close-mindedness than the open-mindedness you claim. Being open-minded is about dialogue and maturity. Not about deciding that something only has one interpretation and shutting down everything else by definition...no matter how righteous you think your opinion is.

Alum 2012
10/29/2013 02:39:35 pm

Well put. It seems that alienating the moderates is now a popular tactic for Brown's more idealistic children (along with dehumanization, you're-either-with-us-or-against-us mentalities and incredibly ironic "privilege-shaming"). It reminds me of religious zealotry.

Alum 2012
10/29/2013 02:29:33 pm

Boring and reused? Have you looked at the buzzwords in your own comment? Oppressors, status quo, counter-narrative, reactionaries, apologists... Pardon me, but you've strangled your own jargon to death. Please use your expensive BA in MCM to invent new words that you can use to paint your anti-intellectual beliefs with a thin veneer of sophistication.

Facts
10/29/2013 12:54:07 pm

http://www.areaconnect.com/crime/compare.htm?c1=New+York&s1=NY&c2=Miami&s2=FL

Facts
10/29/2013 12:55:37 pm

http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/nycdata/public_safety/crime-selectcities.htm

WILL NO ONE ADDRESS THE FACTS?!?
10/29/2013 01:17:21 pm

stevekc
10/29/2013 02:03:46 pm

Okay at this point I cannot tell if you are trolling... but I guess I'll bite, because it's so late, and your all caps are so damn alluring:

Lowered crime rate in NYC does not equal success of stop-and-frisk policies.

ie. correlation does not equal causation

QUASI TROLL... SUCCESS :)
10/29/2013 03:00:10 pm

... but also I expect Brown students to achieve higher order thinking. Half the kids watch the daily show, take a feminism class, and then either feel really, really upset or feel obligated to act really, really upset. Maybe they could look at what is actually happening and draw some of their own conclusions....

What Leah Is Doing:
"I'M ANGRY ABOUT OUR WHITE, PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY AND WILL FREAK OUT WHENEVER GIVEN THE CHANCE"

Hopefully What Leah Can Achieve After Walking Through The Van Winkle Gates:
"I'M REALLY ANGRY ABOUT OUR WHITE, PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY. THIS GUY IS WHITE AND IN POWER AND HIS POLICIES INVOLVE STOPPING AND FRISKING PEOPLE WHO ARE PRIMARILY NOT WHITE. WOA I'M ANGRY. MAybe there's something to be gained from looking at this situation through a different lens. NYC's crime rate has been dropping like a rock for 10 years. It's been noted that violence has gone up recently in areas where stop and frisk hasn't been enforced. Maybe this thing actually works. Regardless its wrong that we are stopping and frisking people based on their ethnicity. Why do these policies end up stopping more minorities? Could it have something to do with socio-economics in addition to race? What would happen if we looked at the average income of all people stopped and frisked. Where are these people stopped and in what neighborhoods? Are the numbers consistent with the demographics of these neighborhoods. Maybe it doesn't matter. I'm willing to live in a place with a higher murder rate if it guarantee's personal freedom. Man, that's a weird thought. At least we aren't like the UK with cameras on every corner. Though, if it saves a teenagers life is it worth it? Do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few? Good God there's a lot going on here. Why haven't I thought of this before? Am I surrounding myself with people that just agree with me? .....(and so on and so forth)"

Alex
10/29/2013 01:22:35 pm

The goal is not for Kelly to be changed by the questions asked but rather the minds of the audience. The power of all of us is what will make a difference in this world. Engage more people by helping them understand the struggles and results of Kelly's policies. Then together we can make a real difference in the world.

Facts
10/29/2013 01:24:05 pm

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/violent-crime-dropping-article-1.1405097

Me
10/29/2013 01:51:08 pm

Leah, really? Did you really delete a comment criticizing your position? How ironic.

""I don't understand the logic that if those opposed to Kelly would just ask him questions, somehow some greater truth would be told. That is simply a privileged understanding of how politics and debate operates in our country."

People of color are the only ones being silenced, and many of us who are black and from NY wanted to engage in conversation with Kelly. Maybe you should reconsider which side is privileged. Not many people in the discussion on this protest are people of color effected by these policies."




Leah (author)
10/29/2013 02:32:16 pm

LET IT BE NOTED that at this time I have not deleted any comments from this post, or edited the post at all.

I have no intention of doing so unless a) this devolves into personal character attacks unrelated to the issue (which so far has not happened); or b) this post becomes a platform for intentionally harmful and damaging comments including vulgar language, racial slurs, or otherwise triggering language (so far this has not happened either).

Thanks,
Leah

YOU HAVE TO BE A HUMANITIES MAJOR BECAUSE ITS LIKE YOU DON'T EVEN SEE THE NUMBERS
10/29/2013 01:54:29 pm

/n

Ken M
10/29/2013 02:22:16 pm

Let me first say, how deeply disappointed I am with much of the Brown community. It is with a heavy heart that I comment on this post. I cannot believe that anyone would be opposed to R Kelly!

He has been producing some of the biggest R&B hits of the past 20 years! A man who has collaborated with the biggest names in music (Aaliyah, Kelly Rowland, Lady Gaga, etc.) should be praised, not shouted down. Brown should throw R Kelly a shower, a golden shower in appreciation for all his work in the music industry.

Jack
10/29/2013 02:44:29 pm

Thank you Brown students for actually engaging with the politics on your community instead of just ignorantly thinking oppression is a fun intellectual hobby, like most people in the comments above seem to think.

Palmi
10/29/2013 02:57:49 pm

Please refer to my previous comment..
But also -
I think it's highly presumptuous of you to claim that most of the above people view topics on oppression as merely a "fun intellectual hobby". The point is that in refusing to engage in discussion, we are perpetrators of exactly the kinds of attitudes we mean to fight against.

Also - it seems that many of the above commenters have a strong emotional opinion on the matter (and as some have said, myself included, have actually been subject to discrimination). It is insulting that you liken these points of views to "hobbies". Just because people don't automatically shut down non-liberal points of views doesn't by definition mean 1. that they are non-liberal and 2. that they take the matter lightly or are close-minded

Alum 2011
10/29/2013 03:09:16 pm

Dissidence = ignorance, you say? Congratulations, you've successfully subscribed to the ideological fascism of the Brown Idealists.

Charlotte '99
10/29/2013 03:40:25 pm

This protest raises an important issue, and Leah, your post and the conversations it's already provoking on Brown alum's' facebooks really have gotten me and a lot of us thinking and have gotten me, at least, reconsidering.

I've seen defense of the right to "free speech" as a cornerstone of my politics for a long time; I've been an active member of the ACLU for my entire adult life. Still, decisions like those in Citizens United and SpeechNow have really demonstrated the incredible inequalities in power and privilege that underlie "free" speech, all but making a mockery of the term.

So I'm a bit skeptical about interrupting his talk as a strategic question (although it has to be said that there's little else in the realm of non-violence that students could have undertaken to raise the profile of the problem as effectively). But I'm surprised to find myself unbothered by the ideological question of letting Ray Kelley "speak"--he is not short of platforms, I object in principle to whatever speaker fee he was given, the and his position is, in any case, quite clear.

Oh, and to the student who keeps posting the links to crime stats--it's a poor window into the state of education at Brown when undergraduates believe that numbers are the only relevant "facts" around, that they are objective and/or comprehensive--and, in this case most importantly, that there are no other "crimes" than the ones counted by the police themselves. I hope this kind of thinking remains uncommon. (I also raised a brow at the reference above to becoming a "policy entrepreneur"--that's a job title that deserves a lot of scrutiny, I think.)

Thanks for your post, Leah. I think it may be one reason why, in the long run, this protest raises the level of debate on campus rather than diminishes it.

D
10/29/2013 03:43:04 pm

Why is it always the shittiest, half-baked, and poorly thought out articles that garner the most attention? I felt like I was reading The Onion here

Leah (author)
10/29/2013 03:54:27 pm

Hi everyone,

I appreciate the huge amount of attention this post has garnered. I was not expecting the outpouring of support I received from my peers and allies in Providence, and I am humbled and so, so grateful for their continued strength.

At this time, after nearly 7 hours of the post being live, I am closing comments. I fully support active debate over this topic. However, as I mentioned above, I will not and cannot tolerate character bashing or offensive language on my website. I wish to create and foster an environment of respectful debate in our larger society, and therefore wish to model that environment on this website.

I understand that many will see this as an act of censorship. I apologize if that is what you perceive this action to be (and yes, I realize that was a sorry-I'm-not-sorry, and it's because I'm not sorry). I am a person with feelings, and those feelings are necessitating that I close comments and get some sleep before starting another day of fielding responses and building a movement tomorrow.

That being said, I do wish to continue the debate. I would direct any parties interesting in joining the conversation to a variety of outlets currently covering this issue:

Brown's Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/BrownUniversity/posts/10151637926101534?comment_id=26962598

Brown Daily Herald: http://www.browndailyherald.com/2013/10/29/ray-kelly-lecture-canceled-amidst-student-community-protest/

New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/30/nyregion/protests-halt-kellys-speech-at-brown-university.html?smid=tw-share

The Atlantic Wire: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/10/ray-kelly-gets-booed-stage-brown-university/71075/

I am updating my Twitter feed as more coverage becomes available. Please reference that log (on the right-hand side of my account) to participate in the debate.

In solidarity,
Leah


Comments are closed.

    Who?

    Writer, eater, feminist, musician.  Let's talk.

    Tweets by @leahjdouglas

    What?

    September 2014
    October 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All
    Feminism
    Harassment

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • About
  • Work
  • Awards, etc
  • Covid-19
  • Contact
  • Newsletter